QUERIES NOT SHARED WHEN CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE (并未共享游标)
前天有个朋友问我了个问题发现v$sqlarea 中文本相同的sql还有很多记录,也就是并未共享游标,也许很多人知道当cursor_sharing=force,可以尽可能的减小hard parse,记住是min,并不是完全防止硬解析,因为解析也很浪费资源
下面看我的实验
SQL> conn system/oracle Connected. SQL> alter system flush shared_pool; System altered. SQL> conn anbob/anbob Connected. SQL> declare 2 c int :=100; 3 begin 4 insert into testsharing values(100,200); 5 insert into testsharing values(300,400); 6 insert into testsharing values(c,500); 7 insert into testsharing values(c,600); 8 execute immediate 'insert into testsharing values(911,1)'; 9 execute immediate 'insert into testsharing values(911,2)'; 10 commit; 11 end; 12 / PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. SQL> conn system/oracle Connected. SQL> col sql_text for a70 SQL> l 1* select executions,loads,sql_text,hash_value,address,sql_id from v$sqlarea where lower(sql_text) like '%testsharing%' and sql_text not like '%$%' SQL> / EXECUTIONS LOADS SQL_TEXT HASH_VALUE ADDRESS SQL_ID ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------- -------------------- 1 2 declare c int :=100; begin insert into testsharing values(100,200) 4245713616 33ABEFB4 0mbv6jgyj0wqh ; insert into testsharing values(300,400); insert into testsharing v alues(c,500); insert into testsharing values(c,600); execute immedia te 'insert into testsharing values(911,1)'; execute immediate 'insert into testsharing values(911,2)'; commit; end; 1 1 INSERT INTO TESTSHARING VALUES(:B1 ,600) 3173049334 33A26CEC 7cdbkm2yk1szq 2 1 insert into testsharing values(:"SYS_B_0",:"SYS_B_1") 1921846338 33AE1570 9tbyx65t8u322 1 1 INSERT INTO TESTSHARING VALUES(300,400) 596477512 33A693DC 5ju5zhwjsv1k8 1 1 INSERT INTO TESTSHARING VALUES(100,200) 4073443016 338E0714 dca5787tcrmq8 1 1 INSERT INTO TESTSHARING VALUES(:B1 ,500) 3038634095 338C13CC aukkkbqujvs3g 6 rows selected.
note:
当然如果plsql中的两条sql完全一样,包括字面常量是还是可以共享的
execute immediate 的也是可以共享
SQL> conn anbob/anbob Connected. SQL> variable c number; SQL> variable d number; SQL> begin 2 :c:=1000; 3 :d:=2000; 4 end; 5 / PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. SQL> SQL> insert into testsharing values(1,100); 1 row created. SQL> insert into testsharing values(:c,200); 1 row created. SQL> insert into testsharing values(:d,300); 1 row created. SQL> insert into testsharing values(:d,:c); 1 row created. SQL> insert into testsharing values(2,500); 1 row created. SQL> commit; Commit complete. SQL> conn system/oracle Connected. SQL> select executions,loads,sql_text,hash_value,address,sql_id from v$sqlarea where lower(sql_text) like '%testsharing%' and sql_text not like '%$%'; EXECUTIONS LOADS SQL_TEXT HASH_VALUE ADDRESS SQL_ID ---------- ---------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------- -------------------- 1 1 insert into testsharing values(:d,:c) 1444290358 338CAB68 bx2d4sxb1c7tq 1 1 insert into testsharing values(:d,:"SYS_B_0") 1404221571 339D2A10 6dg5dhj9v5f43 2 2 insert into testsharing values(:"SYS_B_0",:"SYS_B_1") 1921846338 33AE1570 9tbyx65t8u322 1 1 insert into testsharing values(:c,:"SYS_B_0") 335258613 339D2B68 awdyb549zr8zp
note: 如果指定了不同的绑定变量表,parent cursor 也是不可以共享的
除了上面的还有就是准备修改cursor_sharing 前有时要必须连续 flush shared_pool 两次,
接自 MOS
Interesting. You may need to flush the shared pool “harder”… Try your testcase again, but issue the ALTER SYSTEM FLUSH SHARED_POOL twice in a row before changing the cursor_sharing setting. It looks like that the statement doesn’t show up in V$SQLAREA any longer but still seems not to be flushed entirely and I can find some left-overs of it in the underlying X$KGL library cache fixed tables with the same hash value. After the second “flush shared pool” these are gone and then the cursor sharing works as expected.
还有就是在一些版本中的bug,Bug 7026158
如sql: xx where a=xx and id in(1);
This is happening because of the use of the IN operator.
The same queries are shared when using “=” instead.
Also when optimizer_dynamic_sampling is greater than 1, the above queries are
not shared.
When optimizer_dynamic_sampling =1 then they are shared.
如果列上有histogram也会影响share cursor,还有就是java 程序调用 sql时的各种bug,慢慢研究
上一篇: 10gR2 commit_write
对不起,这篇文章暂时关闭评论。